Consequently, if an employer in its capacity as plan sponsor (and not as plan administrator) obtains legal advice with respect to its power to amend a pension plan, such advice is not obtained for the trust and the plan members have no proprietary interest in the legal advice obtained by the employer. Those are decisions taken under the “employer’s hat” and are not subject to the joint interest principle (Patrick v. Telus Communications Inc., [2005] B.C.J. No. 2829 (S.C.) at paras. 18-21). (2) Application of the law to the evidence
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.