It has been held that the pecuniary interest of the member must be a “real one”: Magder v. Ford, at para. 42. Additionally, since a pecuniary interest results in a prohibition against participation in a public meeting, which if not obeyed, attracts a severe penalty, it is appropriate to strictly interpret the pecuniary interest threshold: at para. 43. In the absence of a real financial interest that has crystallized, a pecuniary interest should not be presumed, nor should the spectre of it prevent a member’s participation in the matter before council: (at para. 42).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.