Is the argument that the panel erred by not independently analyzing the claims of the minor children individually not persuasive?
Canada (Federal), Canada
The following excerpt is from Nam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 FC 783 (CanLII):
The argument that the panel erred by not independently analyzing the claims of the minor children individually is not persuasive as the claims of the minor children were linked to the claim of their mother, the principal applicant: Song v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2008 FC 467, [2008] F.C.J. No. 591, at para. 20.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, must the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a claim that the district court erred by dismissing his Eighth Amendment claim because he did not allege that beef liver was nutritionally inadequate? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any case law that supports the argument that a plaintiff has a valid claim against a defendant who has lost his claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, can the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state prisoner has defaulted on his federal claim in a state court pursuant to an independent and adequate state procedural rule, can he seek a federal habeas review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state prisoner has defaulted on his federal claim in a state court pursuant to an independent and adequate state procedural rule, can he seek federal habeas review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a federal claim is not "adjudicated on the merits" in a state court, if the state court rejects the federal claim, what is the legal test for review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a federal magistrate-judge err in finding that defendants in both official and individual capacities are immune from civil action in both their official capacity and their individual capacity? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the difference between whether an individual is a Convention refugee and whether that individual is in need of protection? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
When will a defendant waive the argument supporting his due-process claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
