Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Gordon v. Allan, 1941 CanLII 139 (SK QB):
In Lee v. Riley (1865) 18 C.B. (N.S.) 722, 34 L.J.C.P. 212, 144 E.R. 629, the owner of a trespassing mare was held liable because the mare kicked a horse.
In Cox v. Burbidge, supra, it was held that if an animal is not lawfully upon a highway but is trespassing, as when it has merely strayed on the highway, the owner is responsible for the ordinary consequences of such trespass.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.