I understood both parties to accept the force of this rule. Its origin is in the premise that a first mortgage conveys to the mortgagee the legal estate in the land. The mortgagor retains only legal and equitable rights to redeem. A second mortgage operates as an assignment of the right to redeem the first mortgage, and of course creates a new right to redeem the second mortgage. The same holds good for third and subsequent mortgages. Thus, the owner of land subject to several mortgages has a right to redeem only the last of the charges, his rights to redeem the prior encumbrances having been successively assigned to the next mortgagee: . . . where there are several successive mortgagees the mortgagor can redeem the next to him without redeeming any other; but if he wishes to redeem any anterior mortgage he must also redeem all who are between that mortgagee and himself. [Teevan v. Smith (1882) 20 Ch.D. 724 (C.A.) per Jessel, M.R.]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.