With respect to the relationship between the offer and the judgment amount, the plaintiff has provided a draft bill of its costs subsequent to the date of the offer. The plaintiff says, and I accept, that the final judgment will clearly exceed the amount of the offer. The plaintiff concedes that the judgment amount did not significantly exceed the offer, but cites Osooli-Talesh v. Enami, 2008 BCSC 1749, as authority for the proposition that an offer which only matches the judgment amount may still entitle the offering party to a double costs award.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.