In Gosbjorn v. Hadley, 2008 BCSC 1614, 44 E.T.R. (3d) 105, the court specifically dealt with the issue of whether an offer that did not comply with Rule 37 could be considered an offer for the purposes of Rule 37B. The offer in that case, which was made in October 2007, included a requirement that each party bear its own costs. The court ultimately concluded that the non-compliant offer could not constitute an “offer to settle” as defined under Rule 37B.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.