The respondent argues that this case should not be treated as an initial custody application for the purpose of the mobility issue because the parties had a de facto arrangement in place for primary residence and weekend access since separation. Thus the factors to consider are those relevant to a variation application: One v. One, 2000 BCSC 1584.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.