Age-Less opposes the motion on the grounds that the right to an examination is discretionary and not a matter of right. (Chote v. Rowan et al., [1943] O.W.N. 237, para. 3). It argues further that an examination by a judgment creditor of a party to a subsequent action commenced by the judgment creditor covering the same ground is not permitted.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.