As an aside, I am inclined to attach significant weight to masters’ opinions on applications like this. I have in mind, in this respect, the reality that masters have advantages arising out of their greater experience in matters of this kind. They hear many more R. 7-6 applications than judges and likely have a more developed sense of the appropriateness of ancillary terms or conditions sought by the parties. In the different but perhaps analogous context of approval of sales in foreclosure proceedings, see the dicta of Esson J.A., as he then was, in British Columbia v. Baron Enterprises Ltd., 2000 BCCA 317 at paras. 44-45.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.