Given that the standard of review of a decision of a Master is the same as that of a judge, (see Zeitoun v. Economical Insurance Group [2008] 91 O.R. (Div. Ct.) at para. 26), we have little difficulty finding that the learned Master made no error of law, did not exercise his discretion improperly, nor made a palpable or overriding error in dismissing the Rule 59.06 motion.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.