The defendants argue that the amended statement of claim discloses no reasonable cause of action because of the expiry of the limitation period. While the expiry of a limitation period is not normally to be considered on a motion to strike for disclosing no reasonable cause of action, the defendants suggest that in certain unique circumstances the court may consider the limitation period on such a motion. For that principle, the defendants rely upon Farrow v. Manitoba (Attorney General) et al, 2009 MBQB 127.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.