However, since hearing the within motion, there has been a subsequent decision in the Pearson case. Although the trial judge acknowledged that there was some uncertainty on this issue in the case law, the trial judge came to a different conclusion on this point. In Pearson v. Canada, 2006 FC 931, [2006] F.C.J. No. 1175, de Montigny J. stated, at ¶54: The purposes of limitation periods are as valid in the context of a Charter claim as they are for any other type of claims; a claimant should not be entitled to sue the Crown indefinitely just because the basis of this complaint is the violation of a constitutional right. As long as the government is not trying to do indirectly what it could not do directly, I see no reason not to apply the limitation period.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.