How has the court considered the normal contingencies of life expectancy?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from McKay v. Govan School, 1967 CanLII 430 (SK CA):
Closely associated with the question of life expectancy of this plaintiff, is the consideration of the normal contingencies of life. The learned judge did refer thereto, particularly and largely in his quotation from Warren v. King, supra. This succinct quotation, approaching an outline or definition of the factors involved, when considered with the tenor of his whole address, fails, I think, to set forth these factors or to stress the same in a manner ensuring their consideration by the jury as points of some major consideration in their calculations.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the effect of section 4(1) of the Statement of Claimant's Affidavit to the Court of Appeal allowing the Court to consider any evidence which is not confined to facts which the deponent is able to prove? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have courts considered "supra" (supra) in an arbitration decision? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What factors will the court consider in determining interim distribution of family property? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What factors will the court consider in determining which province has jurisdiction over a variation proceeding? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the Court of Appeal have any jurisdiction to interfere in a finding of fact from the lower courts? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court require that a document be submitted so that its contents can be reviewed by the court to determine whether it is privileged? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the relevant factors that a court will consider in determining whether or not to exercise jurisdiction? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court review a decision by a majority of the Court of Appeal not adjourning on a motion of appeal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court require that a document be submitted so that the contents of the document can be reviewed by the court to determine whether it is privileged? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How has the Court considered the adequacy of the instruction to the jury as to the meaning of the offence of dangerous driving? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
