What is the legal test for analysis of a patient’s hypothetical choice?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Gilberds v. Sobey, 2011 ABQB 491 (CanLII):
The legal test for this analysis is clearly established. In Reibl v. Hughes, Laskin C.J.C. considered the question of whether a patient’s hypothetical choice would be to engage in or refuse treatment. This assessment is taken from the perspective of the specific patient and the patient’s “particular concerns”, and in that sense the test is ‘subjective’. As a consequence, “[f]ar from making the patient’s own testimony irrelevant, it is essential to his case that he put his own position forward.” (at p. 899).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the legal test for a surgeon to determine whether a patient’s hypothetical choice to refuse treatment should be based solely on the testimony of the patient at trial? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a nurse be terminated for ingesting methadone belonging to a patient after which he continued to treat the patient? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the analysis of the second step of analysis for a breach of a fiduciary duty, or is it likely to be negative or negative? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the duty of confidentiality owed by a doctor to a patient to the patient? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the legal obligation of a doctor to disclose information to a patient? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a husband who has agreed to pay spousal support without the benefit of legal counsel argue that when he signed an agreement to pay support, when he did not have the legal counsel? (Alberta, Canada)
Does lack of negligence in the choice of treatment or the manner in which the treatment was performed negate a physician's additional duty to inform the patient of the risks involved in the recommended treatment? (Alberta, Canada)
In a medical malpractice case, is a doctor permitted to refer to a patient’s medical chart containing information that is not relevant to the patient? (Alberta, Canada)
What legal authority supports a claim for damages for loss of housekeeping capacity? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the legal test for determining whether a question of mixed fact and law is correct or palpable and overriding error? (Alberta, Canada)
