The Lawyer submitted that even if the unproven criminal charges led us to conclude that a risk of harm to the public interest in the administration of justice existed, that risk was not sufficient to require that a suspension be imposed. Indeed, in Law Society of Upper Canada v. Schulz,[6] a proven charge and a criminal conviction did not result in a full interlocutory suspension.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.