What is the test for establishing a resulting trust for the transferor?

The applicable law is set out in Niles v. Lake (1947), 1947 CanLII 5 (SCC), 2 D.L.R. 248: “The law is well settled, I think, that when a person transfers his own money into his own name jointly with that of another person, except in cases with which we are not concerned, then this is prima facie a resulting trust for the transferor. This presumption, of course, is a presumption of law which is rebuttable by oral or written evidence or other circumstances tending to show there was in fact an intention of giving beneficially to the transferee. All these authorities, as well as many others which it would be superfluous to cite here, clearly indicate that a mere gratuitous transfer of property, real or personal, although it may convey the legal title, will not benefit the transferee unless there is some other indication to show such an intent, and the property will be deemed in equity to be held on a resulting trust for the transferor.”