The following excerpt is from R. v. Marshall; R. v. Bernard, [2005] 2 SCR 220, 2005 SCC 43 (CanLII):
40 These principles were canvassed at length in Delgamuukw v. British Columbia, 1997 CanLII 302 (SCC), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 1010, which enunciated a test for aboriginal title based on exclusive occupation at the time of British sovereignty. Many of the details of how this principle applies to particular circumstances remain to be fully developed. In the cases now before us, issues arise as to the standard of occupation required to prove title, including the related issues of exclusivity of occupation, application of this requirement to nomadic peoples, and continuity. If title is found, issues also arise as to extinguishment, infringement and justification. Underlying all these questions are issues as to the type of evidence required, notably when and how orally transmitted evidence can be used. B. Standard of Occupation for Title: The Law
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.