There are policy reasons for being cautious about the use that may be made of outside evidence of intention. These are touched on in the case of Decore v. Decore 2009 ABQB 440 (CanLII) as follows: 1. There is a danger that a flood of spurious claims backed by hearsay will clog the courts and bring chaos to the orderly administration of estates. 2. There is a danger that the written document will be supplanted by an oral or verbal direction.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.