Another case the landlord relied on, Poy v. Philipsen, 2010 BCPC 203, dealt with an attempt by an owner of chattels he loaned to another company in which he had an interest, to recover them or their value from a company to which the chattels had apparently been sold in an asset purchase arrangement. The decision is of little assistance because the legal analysis is quite spare and the oral reasons do not cite any authority, which is understandable as the claimant there was self-represented.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.