In Reid-Woodson v. Turcotte, 2012 SKQB 314, Foley J. addressed the provisions of the Act dealing with the handling of the security deposit and concluded that where “the landlord has not complied with his mandatory statutory obligations, the legislature has removed the landlord’s right to a continued claim of the tenant’s deposit. The legislation does not prevent the landlord from subsequently advancing a claim for damages. It simply removed his right to hold the deposit as security.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.