Secondly, the question is whether the covenants and conditions are expressed in such a manner that they can run with the land. In this regard I respectfully agree with D. C. McDonald J. who said in his unreported reasons for judgment dated 13th March 1974, in dealing with the interlocutory injunction previously mentioned: "The words 'the undersigned, being the registered owner in fee simple of the said lands, and every purchaser and/or transferee from the undersigned, their respective … successors and assigns respectively' are, in my opinion (with which the trial judge may disagree), undistinguishable from the formula described as apt by Romer L.J. in Miles v. Easter, [1933] Ch. 611 at 634-5: '(the) purchasers their heirs and assigns or other the owner or owners for the time being of the land coloured pink or any part or parts thereof."
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.