The plaintiffs could not purchase quiet enjoyment of their existing property by acquiring any property other than the settlement lands. The defendants, persons the plaintiffs believed were rogue neighbours, owned and occupied the settlement lands. These facts make the settlement lands unique for the purposes of Semelhago v. Parmadevan, 1996 CanLII 209 (SCC), [1996] 2 S.C.R. 415, 429.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.