With respect, the trial judge appears to have misunderstood or, at the very least, failed to properly apply the law relating to alibi evidence. The appellant did not need to prove his alibi; the evidence of his alibi need only raise a reasonable doubt that he committed the crime: Lizotte v. The King, 1950 CanLII 48 (SCC), [1951] S.C.R. 115.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.