In Young v. Marshall,[3] the recipient applied to retroactively increase child. The payor did not participate in the hearing although in July 2009 he filed a statement of income, a printout from his employer, and a copy of his 2006, 2007 and 2008 T4’s. In February 2011, the judge drew a negative inference from his failure to supply his income tax returns and current income information. He inferred that his failure to supply income information was because his income had substantially increased from that which was produced in July 2009. He imputed an income to him based on several factors that are not relevant here.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.