Can a joint tenancy be severed by the conduct of the parties?

Manitoba, Canada


The following excerpt is from Davison v. Davison Estate, 2009 MBCA 100 (CanLII):

3 The motions judge correctly identified the issue as whether the joint tenancy had been severed by the conduct of the parties. In this regard, he explained that the conduct must demonstrate a mutual intention to sever. This was not a situation of severance under s. 79 of The Real Property Act, C.C.S.M., c. R30, by agreement or by a unilateral act. See Stonehouse v. The Attorney-General of British Columbia, 1961 CanLII 48 (SCC), [1962] S.C.R. 103 citing, with approval, the classic statement of the three methods of severing a joint tenancy found in Williams v. Hensman (1861), 1 John & H. 546, 30 L.J. Ch. 878.

Other Questions


What is the difference between a joint tenancy and a tenancy in common? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the legal test for severance of a joint tenancy? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is a party entitled to party and party costs? (Manitoba, Canada)
If a decision is not in favour of both parties, should both parties consider retaining counsel? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the cost of a sale of a joint tenancy? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is there any case law where an umpire considered information of one party without the knowledge of the other party? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is a physician's duty to conduct his practice in accordance with the conduct of a prudent and diligent doctor in the same circumstances? (Manitoba, Canada)
In what circumstances will a party be bound by a third party's expectation of receiving something in return? (Manitoba, Canada)
Are party and party costs appropriate on Class III on a motion? (Manitoba, Canada)
Can an application to suppress the true identity of parties to contemplated litigation be made without notice to the other parties? (Manitoba, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.