3 The motions judge correctly identified the issue as whether the joint tenancy had been severed by the conduct of the parties. In this regard, he explained that the conduct must demonstrate a mutual intention to sever. This was not a situation of severance under s. 79 of The Real Property Act, C.C.S.M., c. R30, by agreement or by a unilateral act. See Stonehouse v. The Attorney-General of British Columbia, 1961 CanLII 48 (SCC), [1962] S.C.R. 103 citing, with approval, the classic statement of the three methods of severing a joint tenancy found in Williams v. Hensman (1861), 1 John & H. 546, 30 L.J. Ch. 878.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.