It is also relevant that the appellants have not provided an undertaking as to damages, which is normal in interlocutory injunction proceedings. The failure to provide an undertaking is not always fatal to an applicant. Counsel pointed out that the appellants are financially unable to provide such an undertaking. While that may be understandable, this still is a factor that favours a respondent in a balance of convenience assessment. See Lavoie v. Canada (Minister of the Environment) 1998, F.C.J. 1213 at paragraph 14 per Hugessen J.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.