The argument on the last-mentioned point, as I understood, was that inequality before the law was created by the enactment because under it the respondent no longer enjoyed his right to salary without deductions for contributions to the same extent as other judges who held office before December 20, 1975. Reliance was placed on the reasoning of McIntyre J. in MacKay v. The Queen (1980), 1980 CanLII 217 (SCC), 114 D.L.R. (3d) 393 at pp. 422-3, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 370 at p. 406, 54 C.C.C. (2d) 129, and it was said that there was no valid federal objective to be attained by discriminating on December 20, 1975, between judges appointed on or before and those appointed after February 16, 1975, and that to do so was arbitrary, capricious and unnecessary.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.