Is it inappropriate for a court to be involved in the supervision of a public transit system?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Mandrake Management Consultants Ltd. v. Toronto Transit Commission, 1993 CanLII 9417 (ON CA):

At p. 273 of his reasons for judgment in Turtle v. City of Toronto, supra, Masten J.A. touched upon the inappropriateness of a court becoming involved in the supervision of a public transit system. In this case the trial judge was cognizant of it when the plaintiffs asked him to order a reduction in the speed of the northbound trains entering the station. He properly refused to make that order. Regrettably he did not keep in mind the fact that it is inappropriate for a court to insert itself into the operation of a transit system when he ordered the removal of the frog.

Other Questions


How have the courts interpreted the principles of the Court of Arbitration for the purpose of making decisions at an arbitrator rather than the court? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts dealt with the issue of pre-trial publicity during a public inquiry? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the role of the media in the dissemination of information to the public regarding the events that take place in the court system? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the Court of Appeal have jurisdiction to order a transfer of a cause into this court from another court? (Ontario, Canada)
How has the court considered control and access to the area in question in determining whether the public had access and invited to use the area on the private property for parking purposes? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a landlord be held liable for failing to protect the public from the danger to which the public has been exposed? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for enforcement of a request to obtain an order from a court in Canada from a foreign court? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a parent be found in contempt of court for passively permitting the court order to be undermined? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the impact of a court's consideration of time spent preparing for, travelling to and attending court on a motion? (Ontario, Canada)
How has the court dealt with issues where a lawyer has a tickler system in his office that brought forward the writ for service but the writ was not served until 11 days later? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.