At p. 273 of his reasons for judgment in Turtle v. City of Toronto, supra, Masten J.A. touched upon the inappropriateness of a court becoming involved in the supervision of a public transit system. In this case the trial judge was cognizant of it when the plaintiffs asked him to order a reduction in the speed of the northbound trains entering the station. He properly refused to make that order. Regrettably he did not keep in mind the fact that it is inappropriate for a court to insert itself into the operation of a transit system when he ordered the removal of the frog.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.