In Black v. Hunter 1925 CanLII 125 (SK CA), [1925] 3 WWR 393, at 396, 20 Sask LR 123, Martin, J.A. (as he then was) stated that he failed to see how it was not negligence to allow an 11-year-old boy to use a gun. That case, however, is clearly distinguishable from the instant case, for there., a gun dangerous per se was involved; moreover, there was no evidence in that case that the boy had received any training from the father in the use of the gun.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.