Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Ludwig v. Canada SafewayLimited, 1986 CanLII 2980 (SK QB):
It is admitted that the plaintiff was an invitee. In law the defendant’s duty toward the plaintiff as invitee is to take reasonable care that the premises are safe. In the case of Indermaur v. Dames (1866), L.R. 1 C.P. 274; 35 L.J.C.P. 184; affirmed, L.R. 2 C.P. 311; 36 L.J.C.P. 181 as reported in 35 L.J.C.P., Willes, J., stated at p. 190: And with respect to such a visitor, at least, we consider it settled law that he, using reasonable care on his part for his own safety, Is entitled to expect that the occupier shall on his part use reasonable care to prevent damage from unusual danger which he knows or ought to know, and that where there is evidence of neglect, the question whether such reasonable care has been taken by notice, lighting, guarding or otherwise, and whether there was contributory negligence in the sufferer, must be determined by a jury as matter of fact.”
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.