The Government Respondents rely on Morriss v. HMTQ et al, 2001 BCSC 281. In that case, Master Groves, as he then was, struck out an action as against the individually named defendants. In coming to that conclusion, Master Groves reviewed a number of private law cases in which actions had failed as against individual defendants, and drew the following proposition from them: It is fair to say that these cases read together accept the principle that an officer or employee, acting within the course of the employment, within the authority given to them by their employer, will not be exposed to personal liability unless these actions give rise to a cause of action in tort, or their actions take on such a separate identity from that of their employer so as to make their actions their own. (at para. 11)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.