What is the government's position on exclusive arbitral jurisdiction?

Nova Scotia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Korecki v. Nova Scotia (Justice), 2013 NSSC 312 (CanLII):

The government does not argue that the principle of exclusive arbitral jurisdiction applies in this case. It might have applied in light of Vaughan v. Canada, 2005 SCC 11 had it not been for a representation made by the government to the affected employees.

Other Questions


Does the exclusive jurisdiction principle apply to a comprehensive scheme of grievance without binding arbitration? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the position of a third party in assessing sole responsibility on a vehicle entering a intersection in the face of a flashing red light? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Does public interest immunity bar the production of the government-wide implications and communications plan in the Record? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the limitation period for an application to the Court of Appeal against a Minister's decision that exceeds his jurisdiction? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What are the governing principles for the termination of probationary employment? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How has the respondent defended its position that it did not discriminate against the complainant in a medical malpractice case? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is exclusion of common law couples from the property division and support regimes applicable to married and civil union spouses violated section 15(1) of the Charter? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Does the Court have jurisdiction to stay a claim? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Does a judge have jurisdiction to require a mother to relocate to a particular community in order to continue to have primary care of the children? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Can a party to an action for service ex juris and challenge jurisdiction without attorning? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.