The first factor – whether the offer to settle was one that ought reasonably to have been accepted – is not determined by reference to the award that was ultimately made. Rather, the court must consider whether, at the time that the offer was open for acceptance, it would have been reasonable for it to have been accepted. The reasonableness is to be assessed by reference to the circumstances existing when the offer was open for acceptance, not by reference to the court’s ultimate decision. See Hartshorne v. Hartshorne, 2011 BCCA 29, at para. 27.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.