Even if the father was dilatory, neither that, nor the other status quo evidence would tip the scale in favour of the result sought by mother on this motion in my view. The father raises valid and serious concerns. A parent may make otherwise reasonable health care decisions for a child, along with poor choices. I note that P. Jones J. was confronted with somewhat similar circumstances in Tarkowski v. Lemieux, and she bestowed health decision-making on the mother in that case, but for decisions about vaccines.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.