Put another way, the question is whether the person is able to understand information that is relevant to making a decision in respect of an issue in the proceeding or able to appreciate the reasonably foreseeable consequences of a decision or lack of decision in respect of an issue in the proceeding. As stated in Torok v. Toronto Transit Commission, at para. 40: The ability to appreciate the reasonably foreseeable consequences of a decision or lack of decision in the litigation includes the ability to consider a reasonable range of possible outcomes, including those that are unfavourable. This ability is essentially the capacity to assess risk, which requires consideration of a variety of results, both positive and negative.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.