Where there is a personal relationship between the proposed expert and the party who has retained the expert or the subject matter of the litigation or where the expert has been personally served or where the expert has a personal interest in the outcome of the litigation, all as is the case here, the expert has not been allowed to testify. See, for example, Beazley v. Suzuki Motor Corporation at 2010 BCSC 480 at para. 21.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.