What is the evidentiary burden on a party in a motion under Rule 20?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Inzola Main Street Inc. v. Brampton (City of), 2017 ONSC 5392 (CanLII):

Since the amendments to Rule 20 in January, 2010, various judges have examined this evidentiary burden. In examining the burden of proof on the moving party and the evidentiary burden on the party responding, Justice Karakatsanis, as she then was, utilized the metaphor that each party must “put its best foot forward” in Hino Motors v. Kell, 2010 ONSC 1329 (CanLII) in the following way:

Other Questions


What is the evidentiary burden of a party seeking to change the status quo on an interim mobility motion? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a party who brings the motion as well as the witnesses upon whom the moving/applying party relies have an obligation to present and present witnesses to the motion? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the evidentiary burden on a responding party in a motion for summary judgment? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the evidentiary burden on a responding party in a Rule 20 summary judgment motion? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a motion to obtain personal information from the other party and the non-party? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the evidentiary burden of a motion to prohibit the relocation of Ariyan's residence to Arnprior? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the impact of a party’s email to the opposing party of a parenting motion for custody of the children? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the burden of proof against a party who is not a party to the birth of the child? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a motion to evict a party who is unable to pay the moving party's legal costs? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the evidentiary onus on the responding party in a motion for summary judgment? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.