Further, although both parties in a dispute concerning care and custody of a child bears an evidentiary burden in connection with the best interests of the child, the burden is on the moving party who seeks to change the status quo on an interim mobility motion to establish compelling reasons to grant the motion (see: Hazelwood v. Hazelwood 2012 ONSC 5069). Should an order be made prohibiting the move of Ariyan’s residence to Arnprior pending a trial of the issues in this matter? Should there be a temporary order placing the child in the primary care of the father?
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.