How has the Court considered the evidence of long distance telephone calls, long distance phone calls, and photos of trips and visits?
Canada (Federal), Canada
The following excerpt is from Gadey v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 CanLII 69119 (CA IRB):
As set out in the case of Tae v. Canada[6] I have considered the evidence of the long distance telephone calls, the fund transfer, and the photos of trips and visits. I agree that there is evidence of communication and visits. However, the evidence is not conclusive in itself of the genuineness of a marriage just as a child is not conclusive of a genuine marriage. The appellant and applicant must be credible and significant concerns raised at the hearing must be explained. I find that I am not convinced the appellant and applicant are credible for reasons outlined elsewhere, and significant unexplained concerns remain.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts considered the evidence in the light of the evidence most favorable to the government? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How has the court treated the argument that the court improperly attributed more weight to circumstantial evidence than to direct evidence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a federal habeas review of a claim of insufficiency of evidence in a criminal case, what are the requirements for the federal court to consider all evidence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In reviewing a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, can the court consider affidavits or any other evidence properly before the court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a motion to suppress, does the court have to consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the US Supreme Court consider whether the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court has any authority or authority to issue an opinion in the context of judicial review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any case law in which the federal courts have been ordered to consider the competence of the state courts? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In a federal habeas review of a claim of insufficient evidence, what is the meaning of the phrase "all evidence must be considered in the light of the prosecution"? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When determining whether improperly excluded evidence was harmless error, what factors are considered by the Court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a defendant argues there is insufficient evidence to convict him of a charge of sexual assault, how does the court view the evidence against him? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
