In Peter v. Beblow, 1993 CanLII 126 (SCC), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 980, McLachlin J. writing for the majority said, at p. 987: . . . Canadian courts have adopted the equitable concept of unjust enrichment inter alia as the basis for remedying the injustice that occurs where one person makes a substantial contribution to the property of another person without compensation. And at p. 988: On the remedies side, the requirements of the special proprietary remedy of constructive trust are sometimes minimized . . . . Occasionally the remedial notion of constructive trust is even conflated with unjust enrichment itself, as though where one is found the other must follow.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.