British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from P.B. v. S.L.L. and R.L., 2004 BCSC 1002 (CanLII):
The basic test for unjust enrichment has three parts: Pettkus v. Becker, 1980 CanLII 22 (SCC), [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834: 1. The defendant must be enriched because of the plaintiff's contributions. 2. The plaintiff must experience a corresponding deprivation. 3. There must be no juristic reason for the enrichment. What Constitutes Enrichment?
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.