The term “res gestae” was discussed by Lord Wilberforce in Ratten v. R., [1971] 3 All E.R. 802 (P.C.) at p. 806: The expression ‘res gestae’, like many Latin phrases, is often used to cover situations insufficiently analysed in clear English terms. ... concentration tends to be focused on the opaque or at least imprecise Latin phrase rather than on the basic reason for excluding the type of evidence which this group of cases is concerned with. There is no doubt what this reason is: it is twofold. The first is that there may be uncertainty as to the exact words used because of their transmission through the evidence of another person than the speaker. The second is because of the risk of concoction of false evidence by persons who have been the victim of assault or accident.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.