How have the Complainants argued that discriminatory enforcement of regulations constitutes a "service" within the meaning of the Human Rights Act?
Nova Scotia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Reed v Province of Nova Scotia (Department of Environment), 2018 CanLII 89418 (NS HRC):
96. The Complainants rely on Johnson v. Halifax Regional Police Service, 2003 CarswellNS 621, [2003] N.S.H.R.B.I.D. No.2, 48 C.H.R.R. D/307 for the argument that the discriminatory enforcement of regulations constitutes a “service” within the meaning of the Human Rights Act.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What are the costs of a human rights case brought by an applicant who alleges that the Human Rights Commission treated him unfairly? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Can a decision about extending time for a human rights complaint be reviewed for reasonableness? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What decisions have been made by the Human Rights Board of Inquiry on the issue of refusal of rental accommodations based on family status? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What grounds are sufficient to raise an arguable issue within the meaning of Article 4.03? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for unreasonable delay in applying for Charter of Human Rights? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the current interpretation of s. 15(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Code? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Does retaliation not have to be the only reason for an employer's decision to dismiss a human rights complaint? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Does a change in income constitute a change of circumstances? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Does the payback of a cash payment constitute a prepayment penalty? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the difference between the Charter and the Bill of Rights? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
