However, it would appear that an equitable execution does not create a charge. The leading case for this proposition appears to be Stevens v. Hutchinson, [1953] Ch. 299 at 305, [1953] 2 W.L.R. 545, [1953] 1 A11 E.R. 699: The effect, then, of the appointment of a receiver is that it does not create a charge on the property, but that it operates as an injunction against the judgment debtor receiving the income; and it may, although that appears to be a matter of some doubt, also give the right to the judgment creditor to obtain an injunction against third parties receiving that income.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.