The particular procedures that meet the duty vary with particular circumstances. As the majority said in Knight v. Indian Head School Div. No. 19, 1990 CanLII 138 (SCC), [1990] 1 S.C.R. 653 at 682 “the concept of procedural fairness is eminently variable and its content is to be decided in the specific context of each case”. The majority held that the existence of a general duty to fairness depends on the nature of the decision to be made by the administrative body; the relationship of that body to the effected party; and, the effect of the decision on the individuals’ rights.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.