Is an arbitrator required to provide reasons or analysis?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Kong v Lee, 2021 BCSC 606 (CanLII):

An arbitrator’s duty to provide reasons is not met by a statement of fact, unsupported by any reasons or analysis: Christiansen v. Woodward, 2009 BCSC 311 at paras. 17–18. That is what occurred here: the Arbitrator simply stated a conclusion, without any reference to the evidence of the parties, both oral and documentary, or the principles of contract law.

Other Questions


What are sufficient reasons are required for a trial judge to leave a defendant with no reasonable doubt? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a parent required to earn as much income as reasonably possible to provide support for their children? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for calling a witness who could reasonably reasonably be expected to provide supporting evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Arbitrator have to provide reasons for a decision? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a service provider required to disclose the name and location of a residential home and the name of the service provider? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of requiring a plaintiff to provide blood and urine samples for analysis? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a school district required to provide a reasonable accommodation for a child with special educational needs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a complainant required to provide a compelling reason for the delay in filing his EHSC complaint? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a proposed amendment to the Rules of Arbitration for Arbitration would be prejudicial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of proof required to establish reasonable grounds in civil cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.