In Roseau River Anishinabe First Nation v. Roseau River Anishinabe First Nation (Council), [2003] F.C.J. (Q.L.) No. 251, Kelen J. described the application of the duty of fairness as follows: Decisions made by legislative bodies of a general nature and based on broad considerations of public policy are considered to be immune from the duty of fairness. In contrast, an administrative decision that is directed at a particular person and affects "the rights, privileges or interests" of that individual will trigger the application of the duty of fairness, see Baker v. Canada, supra ...” (at para. 42).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.