Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Little Plume v. Weir, 1998 ABQB 523 (CanLII):
In Stewart v. Pettie (supra at page 146), Major, J. points out that while the courts have historically been reluctant to impose liability for a failure by an individual to take positive action, this reluctance has been tempered where there is a special relationship between the parties that warrants the imposition of a duty. Major, J. found that every person who enters a bar or restaurant is in an invitor-invitee relationship, and therefore in a special relationship with the establishment. He did not accept, however, that the mere existence of this special relationship without more permits the imposition of a positive obligation to act, or, in other words, a duty. He suggested that a commercial host can consider other relevant factors in determining whether in the circumstances positive steps are necessary.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.