Any duty judge, in the course of his or her responsibilities as the duty judge, may decide that a case or an issue before him/her gives rise to an issue of bias (real or apprehended) that might lead to his/her recusal. Any decision in that regard, taken or not taken by a judge in relation to a given matter, may subsequently be reviewed (as is occurring in the present case) on the basis of the governing objective test set out in, amongst other places, Committee for Justice and Liberty v. Canada, supra.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.